The Two Kinds of Colocation Failover

The Two Kinds of Failovers

Active/Active
  • Pros
    • Global Load Balancing (GLB) supported
    • Automated fail over
      • Less down time
    • Automated or manual roll back to primary in most cases
  • Cons
    • (Generally) More expensive then active/passive fail over
    • Setup is more complex
  • Notes
    • If we are going to pay for a colocation site why not utilize it?
    • Real time data replication
Active/Passive
  • Pros
    • Cheaper
    • Simpler
  • Cons
    • Manual Failover
      • Longer downtime than an automated process (could be just minutes)
      • This would require someone to flip the switch, which could be tricky in the event of a disaster.
    • No GLB with this option
    • The co-location site is not being utilized except in a DR situation.
  • Notes
    • Daily/weekly data replication.

Related posts: